New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Michael.

I really cant believe that your making your point with such weak arguement.
Youve basically classified all breakouts as conforming to your singular entry criteria.

There are literally 100s of ways to define a breakout.

I could point out Techtraders Breakout criteria as a positive example but that has no validity as a singular entity.

To argue that Random entry is more profitable than all breakout entrys is crazy in my view.

EVERY trend in EVERY timeframe begins with a breakout from something.

Add another 10 or more valid breakout criteria to filter entry against random.

Add to that criteria which place a POTENTIAL breakout in to a higher probability such as that in T/T (Which is very basic) and you have a far more potent entry that the canned version you have supplied.

Add to that your exit which you ignore as relevant.
Failure is deamed relative to longterm result only???

TH works in 60 second timeframes and Ill bet there is a breakout of some sort
in his timeframe.

Out of interest,do you believe ANY entry is better than Random or are all entries in your view a delusional "Feel good" method of entering a trade?

<blockquote data-quote="tech/a" data-source="post: 288233" data-attributes="member: 257">Michael.I really cant believe that your making your point with such weak arguement.Youve basically classified all breakouts as conforming to your singular entry criteria.There are literally 100s of ways to define a breakout.I could point out Techtraders Breakout criteria as a positive example but that has no validity as a singular entity.To argue that Random entry is more profitable than all breakout entrys is crazy in my view.EVERY trend in EVERY timeframe begins with a breakout from something.Add another 10 or more valid breakout criteria to filter entry against random.Add to that criteria which place a POTENTIAL breakout in to a higher probability such as that in T/T (Which is very basic) and you have a far more potent entry that the canned version you have supplied.Add to that your exit which you ignore as relevant.Failure is deamed relative to longterm result only???TH works in 60 second timeframes and Ill bet there is a breakout of some sortin his timeframe.Out of interest,do you believe ANY entry is better than Random or are all entries in your view a delusional &quot;Feel good&quot; method of entering a trade?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tech/a, post: 288233, member: 257"] Michael. I really cant believe that your making your point with such weak arguement. Youve basically classified all breakouts as conforming to your singular entry criteria. There are literally 100s of ways to define a breakout. I could point out Techtraders Breakout criteria as a positive example but that has no validity as a singular entity. To argue that Random entry is more profitable than all breakout entrys is crazy in my view. EVERY trend in EVERY timeframe begins with a breakout from something. Add another 10 or more valid breakout criteria to filter entry against random. Add to that criteria which place a POTENTIAL breakout in to a higher probability such as that in T/T (Which is very basic) and you have a far more potent entry that the canned version you have supplied. Add to that your exit which you ignore as relevant. Failure is deamed relative to longterm result only??? TH works in 60 second timeframes and Ill bet there is a breakout of some sort in his timeframe. Out of interest,do you believe ANY entry is better than Random or are all entries in your view a delusional "Feel good" method of entering a trade? [/QUOTE]

Verification