I'l second that.....
Geeeez Burnsy , you just killed my lunch
anyone got a link to where i can vote against this lycra wearing in public ?
We should get rid of that silly compulsory seat belt rule as well.
Preventing obesity and smoking can save lives, but it does not save money, according to a new report.
It costs more to care for healthy people who live years longer, according to a Dutch study that counters the common perception that preventing obesity would save governments millions of dollars.
I am all for that and all for no helmets on motorcycles etc.
As an adult in a modern society I believe they should be my choices. Governments should should be to present me the research (i.e education), without fear or favor, and then let me decide.
I believe this to be due to the introduction of the bicycle helmet by the meddling lefties of the eighties.
gg
Thank you all for the comments.
The main thrusts of my argument were:
Many people have been discouraged from cycling because of the need to buy and wear these pieces of fragile foam.
2. They are not comfortable to wear.
3. There is no proof they prevent death or spilling of brain matter, even on micro analysis (for you tech/a lol)
We already do. You need to get out more. Maybe you can't see all the cyclists from your cafe vantage point due to all the lycra clad cyclists blocking your viewWe would have a vibrant bicycle culture if these egg tops were made optional.
You missed out on no. 5
gg
GG we all know 5's are important to you.
You are obviously off your meds. First the thread of delusional grandeur now your thread of false "facts".
In principle that sounds sensible, but in practice you know very well that a great chunk of our population would not read the research, and/or be incapable of evaluating it in any worthwhile way.As an adult in a modern society I believe they should be my choices. Governments should should be to present me the research (i.e education), without fear or favor, and then let me decide.
In principle that sounds sensible, but in practice you know very well that a great chunk of our population would not read the research, and/or be incapable of evaluating it in any worthwhile way.
So once again we fall back on the position of legislating for that cliche "the lowest common denominator" and the choice is removed from us.
Although I have little sympathy with this approach in general, in the case of helmets I think it makes absolute sense.
Re the Lycra, that is another whole story! Especially on anyone even one kilo overweight.
I'm happy to accept that, TH. I wasn't specifically referring to that study alone, but rather the general principle of governments making decisions on our behalf.Julia that study is severely flawed. It doesn't take into count the extra revenue of a healthy person working and paying tax v a sick unproductive person. And that study didn't take into count the quality of live of people that are obese and smoke.
Hmm, I too love to see people having a go. But please could they not wear tight fitting stuff that just accentuates the rolls of fat. Just too gross!As for the lycra cycling cloths aren't made of that. haven't since about 86. mostly its a poly/cotton blend. yep fat middle age people don't look great in anything tight fitting. But stiff ****. I love it when I go for a ride and see beach road full of all sorts having a go. Its Australia not Afghanistan under the Taliban!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?