MichaelD
Not fooled by randomness
- Joined
- 7 December 2005
- Posts
- 912
- Reactions
- 2
Same flamin game with RIO instalments, I hold RIOIMU (MacQuarie warrant) and they have completely pulled the market, I could'nt sell them even if I wanted to.
Same nonsense with BHPIMX which I also hold, bid 3.49, ask 4.49.
Amazing
Warrants. I think I remember them, they are for selling time decay aren’t they.
They are at the other end of the scale from uranium. They have a half life of a walk to the water cooler.
Giday trembling hand
I bought 1500 of those RIOIMU over the 30th and 31st of last month at an average cost of $14.81.
I sold 500 on 12th @ $43.31 and another 500 yesterday @ $40.15.
I still hold the last 500.
I am trying to calculate the cost of time decay, can you help me out as my calculator only goes up to ten places after the decimal point and the impact of time decay still has'nt appeared
Mike
I took it upon myself to mention the absurd spread in RIO (RT) to the ASX, and lo and behold, I actually got a reply;
Dear Michael,
Thank you for the feedback.
The Designated Price Makers (DPMs) are still testing systems in 'fast stocks'. This is only the 1st week of the market and we expect pricing accuracy will improve. We understand the issue in Rio and are working on the DPMs to improve spread and consistency.
However please note other ASX CFDs where the spread and volume have been equal and even inside at times to underlying (eg ANZ, BHP).
Despite the promising sounding words, the spreads on the ASX share CFDs remain quite wide, and since there's essentially no traded volume, you're effectively limited to accepting the price spreads the various Market Makers offer.
Don't know about the currencies and indicies - haven't looked at them at all.
I notice some posters have said that short selling shares affect the market. To my knowledge ASX cfd's and Designated cfd providers (OTC) are the only way to short sell stocks and even then the list is limited.
Considering ASX cfd's are not liquid and Designated cfd providers (OTC) don't deal directly into the market, where is the short selling affect on share prices?
Maybe someone knows what effect Short selling shares via CFD DMA in Australia has on market prices? Major or minimal effect. Surely all the high rollers aren't enrolled with a CFD provider to access this market.
Like to know. Thanks.
You can short sell share normally without using CFDs too, the ban is only on naked selling.To my knowledge ASX cfd's and Designated cfd providers (OTC) are the only way to short sell stocks and even then the list is limited.
Maybe someone knows what effect Short selling shares via CFD DMA in Australia has on market prices? Major or minimal effect. Surely all the high rollers aren't enrolled with a CFD provider to access this market.
Like to know. Thanks.
Yes this list from yesterday has relatively small turnover.Minimal I would say.
How skyquake?You can short sell share normally without using CFDs too, the ban is only on naked selling.
The list of shares available to sell Short is small but they weigh on the Index then that would spill over to the rest of the non shortable stocks when the Index is declining faster.Originally Posted by Bevo --
Don't know the total effect on ASX, depends on how many people are shorting there just selling borrowed stock into the market creating selling pressure when they cover they buy back which creates buying pressure, when they ban short selling and everyone runs for the exit well its abit like a elevator with no safety brakes and someone cuts the cable.
Just get stock borrow? Its just covered shorting. The way its always been done. Don't need CFDs to get it done. (the CFD providers get borrow from a fund or something and allow its clients to short the stocks, ASX MM's do the same) its just all covered short selling.
I have Shorted stocks on the ASX through a CFD provider (NOT DMA) so they did not borrow the stocks to short sell. Am I right in saying this is naked short selling? This is the practice of non DMA CFD brokers (DMA covers a short sell) and how can it happen since uncovered short selling is banned?
I have Shorted stocks on the ASX through a CFD provider (NOT DMA) so they did not borrow the stocks to short sell. Am I right in saying this is naked short selling? This is the practice of non DMA CFD brokers (DMA covers a short sell) and how can it happen since uncovered short selling is banned?
Non DMA CFD brokers wouldn't need to cover because as far as I know the orders don't go into the real market.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?