- Joined
- 3 April 2013
- Posts
- 1,062
- Reactions
- 275
Adding to that, I've noticed that with Radge's trades there are a lot more 1R losses than I am prepared to take. Sometimes I will take a setup and end up managing it differently to the site.
I also find that I diligently filter through the setups because some present better opportunities IMO than others.
It would be easy to be smacked with a consecutive runs of 1R losses and thus I think it's better to have some of your own idea before just jumping in.
Pav, while I don't know specifically which service you're referring to of Radge's, this is on the whole bad advice for someone new to the markets. "Look at the way the pro does it and then change\modify it cause you know better."
There's a reason Nick trades the way he does, and while one may learn over time that they like to do things differently, I would nearly guarantee the changes possibly made by someone new to the markets would only be detrimental.
fiftyeight, if you've got the $ by all means start trading Radges systems. You'll learn alot and in the long run financially it's one of the easiest r:r setups available.
It's a good point.
His system makes money. I don't want to confuse anyone.
It's also important to develop your own ideas on trading. I guess that will come from being exposed to a number of different ideas and testing them out.
I've learnt (and am still learning) a tremendous amount from Radge's setups and trading philosophy. He is exceptionally good IMO.
There is a big advantage in starting the learning curve in a down market. Too many beginners start in a bull market ("because everybody seems to be making money so I'll get in too") and then have no idea how to handle a downturn and give up. You will learn a lot more starting at this end of the market.
Cheers
Country Lad
Totally agree with this!
Excellent.
There is no way I will be able to wait 2 years, thats some good dedication Pav.
If I am strictly following Nick Radge, I dont get why I have to sim his system? What am I missing? He already has a proven system?
My own system on the other hand may need years as with Pav to become profitable.
Cheers
My own system on the other hand may need years as with Pav to become profitable.
Yes you are correct.
Nicks is a robustly tested and proven trading system.No need to test it.
I agree with boofis's comment on Nicks method.
It is a system and as such if your trading it DONT TOUCH IT!
Regardless of results.
Dont confuse discretionary trading with systems trading.
Entirely different.
Bad choice of words, doughy from night shift.
If I do not need to test it, do I/ should I still need to sim it? I am confused
Cheers
No, don't sim Radge's stuff.
Yes, sim any markets you have an interest in.
Yes, sim Radge's stuff along side trading it if you want to play around with any of the conditions and see how 'this' affects 'that'.
That's my
There is no way I will be able to wait 2 years, thats some good dedication Pav.
Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?