Good post, as the one above it (Barney's post). And mostly, the tech talk is about basic economic principles - I learnt about supply & demand in high school.
Is this back to that rubbish about getting shareholders to approve their payrises after the MAMMOTH 6% capital raise? Because that'll really shift the voting pattern to an unfair level where they will be able to approve anything.
Seriously.
There's been a lot of mention of RED Management seeking $25m, but only getting $15m. Where does it say this? Apart from this forum of course?
Because I can't see it anywhere.
I went long at 2.30 2 days before C/R halt, mainly for fundamental reasons, happy to ride out some movements. But obviously not overly happy about the C/R, but that happens.
Also risk inherently is lower with RED than most specs. They have assets. They own a mine. If production is delayed...
I know this has been responded to already, but someone is foolish and a poor trader because they have gone long on RED and didn't see a CR coming?
Is this your premise?
Really?
Keep in mind there are such thing as guaranteed stops for instances like this.
No, 'open positions'. 92% of those with open positions have LONG positions (feel a bit foolish now?) Obviously this would have been prior to halt but thought it was interesting anyway.
I wouldn't have thought I was getting defensive, I appreciate the posts about TA, just not the ones about fundamentals where it's been acknowledged there's no interest (ignorant comments about mine operations, first gold pour etc) - that's where my frustration was.
Nah it definitely isn't full production until June - my understanding it was a lower rate up until then, and a higher cost of production too. But even so, NPV at the reduced rate places RED SP significantly higher than $2.30
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.