Hi Evelyn, As far as I can see there is no advantage to opting out, and we may get something if we stay in (though I'm not working that into my cashflow!!). IMF have also confirmed that we are not up for any contribution if we lose.
Cheers, John H
Seamisty, Haven't we been there before? I have a distinct feeling of deja vu. I really must contain my comments otherwise this site would be in danger of being closed down again!!!
Anyway, lets hope we can afford to forget about this just for a few days, and wish all of you a Peaceful...
I wonder if the .05% prove to be right? If you think back, that was probably the percentage of people against Wellington at the road shows. Sadly I was not one of them.
Tucked in amongst all the Angus Security Announcements today http://www.nsxa.com.au/ftp/news/021724652.PDF - Reckon that's about half a cent return for every $1000 invested!!!!
Likes holidays in China
https://picasaweb.google.com/alliott.agphotos.group/AGWorldwideConferenceBeijingDinnerAtTheGreatWallOfChina#5187406087295576178
............... and also (surprise surprise) a Kate Hanrick also worked/works for
McCullough Robertson!!!!
Reminds me of my dear old dad Charles, he used to say "I am a simple man of taste!" As regards to the logic, there can really only be one interpretation of Wellington's actions, and I just cannot understand why ASIC have not stepped in. ...Do they have the equivalent of the UK Fraud Squad in...
I have no doubt that Charles that we would have no difficulty providing candidates for the IAC. But what is the point in even standing. Wellington refused to publish the voting in the last "election", and for all we know the representatives were figments of somebody's imagination.
However...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.