Therein lies the huge problem with it.
Even if someone does have PHI they're still better off financially by not using it.
At least with car or house insurance there's a set "excess" amount you'll pay and they cover the rest. So consumers know what a claim will cost before they've had reason to make one.
Most liked posts in thread: The Future of Private Health Insurance
Page 2 of 2
Fully agree, after nearly loosing a thumb in a home accident,i ended up paying 3k from my own pocket while having at the time the top gold cover hospital And others
Even physio reeducation was costing me serious out of pocket, and yet these were minimal fees, not over the roof
I since try to reduce policy cost and will head straight to the public hospital if given the choice
Phi and super are just extra taxesSmurf1976 likes this.
The fact that "The government spends about $6 billion a year propping up the private health insurance industry through the income-tested rebate." and the fact that it will only continue to rise and rise (along with premiums), means that "something's gotta give". Whether any Government will be prepared for the inevitable public backlash and vested interest lobbying we can only guess.
To me, this is a classic case of Government starting a scheme (the rebate mess) that has long-term structural implications and eventually leads to industry dependence. It is similar to the current Franking Credits and Neg Gearing policies in that respect - the costs can only rise over time and people structure their affairs around the scheme. Any attempt to wind them back gets framed as "a tax" and is easy meat for political opponents and media in search of conflict.SirRumpole likes this.
PHI used to work well, but doesn't now. Medicare used to work well but doesn't now.
There are lots of contributing factors, population growth and an aging population being 2 major ones. But I blame medical researchers. Broadly speaking, they have failed to provide solutions. The degree of failure is absolutely astronomical.
With trillions of dollars spent, modern medical science can only cure a tiny handful of conditions. It can cure bacterial infection and some viruses; it can prevent some such infections with vaccines; it has some surgeries and other interventions which are clearly life-saving. But actual cures are extremely rare. Consider just what sort of failure this represents when most conditions and complaints are treated at the symptom level. Consider also what sort of pressure this places on a system when doctors are only able to continue patching symptoms instead of curing conditions outright.
At some point in history, the population became used to the idea that medical science would never really get on top of the responsibilities they were tasked with. In the 1960's, man walked on the moon, and yet medical researchers are still messing around trying to find a cure for the common cold. Obviously there are some brilliant exceptions, but taken as a whole, they have failed very badly.
The spotlight needs to be taken off the private funds and shone squarely on the lab geeks, the academics, the universities and Big Pharma.Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
Medical science is going to need to come to grips with this fact (stress causes illness), because in the US and Australia, mental illness in children is growing at unprecedented levels. With the amplification of time, this will trasnlate into a major healthcare crisis. The wise fools in the research labs and governing bodies are trying to get kids off drugs and make them exercise and eat better diets, which is completely the wrong approach. Drug use, lack of exercise and poor diet are symptoms of mental illness. They can't get around this symptom-level fixation. They are causing enormous problems with such an approach. They will do everything but admit that kids need love and attention from parents who are properly attuned to their needs. https://www.cdc.gov/childrensmentalhealth/data.htmlLast edited: Dec 4, 2019Skate likes this.
Unrealistic expectations of life perhaps, the idea that in a modern technological society more things will be done for us. Maybe that's the problem, too much reliance on technology and too little on individual achievement.
Who knows, I'm no psychologist.
Either pay the basic hospital cover or cop the tax penalty.It's as simple that,kids(Johnnie Howard's words,I think)Those youngsters under thirty,quitting in droves right now,aren't thinking far ahead are they? They'll all be sorry when they start earning a decent wage and then get hit with the extra 1% plus the killer, 10 year lifetime health cover loading.Oh well,nobody cares about smokers paying 60+ % tax and beer drinkers,40+% ...more coin for Treasury,I guess.sptrawler likes this.
This is a great thread folks, I really appreciate the comments. I have a few to add but need a bit of time to compile. It was an area I had invested in (NHF). However I was not sure I was comfortable in profiting from the system as a shareholder. Got out in May last year with decent profit, and missed some further good upside. I just looked and it has had a decent slide from July Last year. Happy I went with my ethics.
I can't comment on the investment aspects except to say that I wouldn't touch them with a barge pole, but I've had PHI for 30 years and I'm seriously considering giving it up, but with my luck, as soon as I do I'll probably need it ! The care given in the public system is very good and could be even better if the subsidies to PHI were reduced, so the incentive to PHI is reducing.
I don't think Medibank private should have been sold, it's now just another player in a field that shows no inclination to compete apart from by how much it can put up its fees, just like the rest. IMV PHI is really in a death spiral and unless there is government intervention in some way then the industry will decline and die.
We are also waaaaayyyy in front....having utilised phi to access surgical procedures for my wife (major spinal) not available in public system. ...with surgeon of our choice. It also has provided fast access for “elective” procedure for me that would have been a serious pia to endure a long wait on a public waitlist. Paid for itself many times over.
In a private sense, we probably break even on PHI. A couple of hospitalisations per year over the past few years and three "elective" (not really elective) surgeries between my wife and I have certainly soaked up a decade's worth of premiums. Our main "problem" is that my wife comes from a medical family and choice of surgeon is a huge deal with lots of research involved. Strangely (not so strangely) this has resulted in both of us ending up with the highest priced specialists and some truly huge out-of-pockets not covered by our PHI or medicare.
I am not surprised that people are opting out. Both my kids have done so despite the extra medicare levy.
Despite my scepticism about the future of the industry in Australia, I do note that two largest listed PHI companies on the ASX ( MPL and NHF) have both had a quite good year.
I don't know what appropriate figures would be in the medical profession but if the cost of them being there is $45 an hour then that requires that their actual pay rate is somewhere in the $15 - $30 range which is rather ridiculous.
but i wouldn't begrudge them that sort of fee at all. they've earned it. they had to have been a high achiever to get into medical school in the first place, then years of study, followed by internship at a hospital where they probably were paid the equivalent of $15 - $30 an hour, then several more years of practicing full time whilst training their specialty. and they do great things, saving lives and making people's lives better, unlike most of our politicians.
so they fully deserve it, i'm not arguing against them charging that sort of fee at all. i just don't see how it's fair that i had to cover most of it. i paid about $1200 a year in insurance for nearly 10 years before i finally moved overseas, and immediately cancelled my private health, as you don't incur lifetime loading penalties whilst you're a foreign resident.
when i needed to call upon that cover, they picked up maybe $1000 in private hospital accommodation charges and practically nothing on the ridiculous scheduled fees (medicare actually pays 75% of the scheduled fee, private health only picks up the remaining 25%, and of course you, the patient, are fully responsible for the gap, which completely dwarfs the scheduled fee, no amount of private health cover will save you from that).
and i was one of the fortunate ones, i'd already been investing for many years by that point, so this unforeseen cost, whilst shocking, barely dented my finances. but others may not be so lucky when they get cheated by the system. the system is broken and it's inflicting hardships on the people it's meant to help, either by hitting them with unexpected gap fees, or by pushing them into the already overcrowded public system in an effort to avoid those gaps.
A proposal by the Grattan Institute to reform the PHI industry.
Interesting that they seem to be in cahoots with Medibank Private.
Make up your own minds on that.
It is interesting that we have chosen to base PIH on the idea of cross-subsidising everyone, which is the issue the Grattan Institute tries to address, at least as far as age-risk is concerned.
It makes me wonder why those responsible for health care do so little to reduce the lifestyle risks.
OK we have had a big anti smoking campaign (with great opposition by vested interests), but alcohol and obesity have been basically ignored.
Alcopops tax was rejected by the LNP and a sugar/salt/fat tax (or other measures to reduce these) have not seen the light of day in this government.
Part of the ageing population syndrome have been higher health costs, surely a greater emphasis on a healthier lifestyle should be essential to reducing those costs.
The only short term solution I can think of is one which would never be permitted. That is, the education of wannabe parents that if they can't properly provide a loving environment for children, then they shouldn't have them. They need to understand they may have a very hard time with their offspring if they can't create the proper environment. Something like the 'dogs aren't just for xmas' slogan.Last edited: Dec 4, 2019
Page 2 of 2