The Commonwealth has impossed an experimental 40 kph LIMITED SPEED AREA upon the territory and states,there is no conferred legislative authority for police to enforce under the 1999 Australian road rules in that absence all Australian motorists are charged with the wrong offense a breach of rule 21 instead of rule 23.
A breach of the Australian road rules does not createa an offense for example not weaing a seat belt in a veichle manufactured without seatbelts.
In MCPAD 287-01 Nation wide municiple coucils are errectng END OF KPH LIMITED SPEED signs in streets other than the steet to which the speed limit applies in breach of rule 328 of the aust road rules.The legal effect is all motorists are permitted according to those signs to drive up to the default speed limit (50/60 kph ) and incurr a wrongfull infringement notice by police for exceeding a 40kph limited speed area.
It was never S.A transports intention to enfore 40 kph limited speed area as a speed limit applying to a length of road (rule 21) rather a limited speed applying to an area rule(23) proir to our territory and states adopting 40 kph limited speed area and the 1999 australia road rules.What happens in a defense of an alledged offense is an abhorent confict between the two rules with illogical reasoning .
A defense is police are charging all Australian motorists with the wrong offense in breach of the summary proceedures act and all aust courts have no authority to detirmine the matter it is for that reason why The police of the dept of public prosecution withdrew the charges in AMC-03-8201 and AMC 02-19050
The territory and states can review but do not have authority to ammend the australian road rules.
Beware these precedence of aqittal with reference to action numbers should only be used with someone familiar in court process and best left to being represented by a solisitor with costs being granted.
thanking you matross