Quantcast LNC - Linc Energy - Aussie Stock Forums - Page 111

Page 111 of 127 FirstFirst ... 1161101109110111112113121 ... LastLast
Results 2,201 to 2,220 of 2533
  1. #2201

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Mickel thanks for your insight and research.

    I suppose to summarise the Velocys microchannel reactors look promising but are not yet commercially complete.

    I have to say still think a $10m plant producing 2500 BOPD seems too cheap - but I agree there may well be other ancillary equipment that is not included in the capex. But in any case the first plant in China will have the CAPEX paid by GCL

    Still leaves us wondering when the deal with GCL will be signed off.

  2. #2202

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Quote Originally Posted by basilio View Post
    Still leaves us wondering when the deal with GCL will be signed off.
    Well, my thoughts are that November 23rd is the six month date of the in-line test for the FT reactor at Lincs GTL plant. The AGM is on the 29th of Nov. So you would have to think that late November sounds good if you subscribe to the theory that it’s the tech holding things up.

  3. #2203

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    More good news from AFC Energy-

    Latest Independent Technology Review Highlights Progress at AFC

    September 10, 2012

    The key highlights identified in the report reiterate AFC Energy’s own announcements on progress, stating that AFC Energy has:

    •Completed its Beta cartridge test programmes at Dunsfold and Bitterfeld;
    •Completed development of the Beta+ cartridge technology;
    •Established three operational demonstration systems based on the Beta+ technology;
    •Created a dedicated production facility and a team that has already produced cartridges that are currently under long-term test;
    •Developed these systems to the point at which they can be interrogated and operated (started/stopped) with ease, even from a remote location;
    •Supported successful operation of three Beta+ systems simultaneously;
    •Run the Beta+ demonstration systems for a combined total of several thousand hours; and
    •Continued to build a very strong relationship with its first key customer, AkzoNobel

    http://www.afcenergy.com/regulatory-...ogress-at-afc/

    Hopefully LNC will explain their plans with AFC Energy at the forthcoming AGM.

  4. #2204

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    The news from AFC is very good. I keep wondering how/when/where LNC is going to integrate its UCG capacity to use this technology. They havn't really given any indication of their intentions in this area.

    Of course another possibility is that AFC takes off and LNC goes along for the ride with its 12% stake.

  5. #2205

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Some big movement in LNC today. Almost 6m shares changing hands and currently 12% increase in SP.

    One piece of significant news was the opening of the first AFC fuel cell production line. LNC has 12% of AFC and would be one of partners in using the fuel cells for CO2 free production of electricity from its UCG technology

    http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/deta...lay=news&it=le

  6. #2206

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    I was overseas at the time of the 2011 AGM and only caught up with the video of it that was posted on the LNC site.

    I have now learned that the BRR recording below of the AGM has a link to the slides in the bottom left hand corner "Download Slides (5.3 mb)". It has 53 slides- not 38 on the LNC site- and the last 15 slides reveal the Velocys and AFR plans by LNC. Not sure why they wern't included on the LNC site (apparently the audio was also cut short), perhaps it was meant to be confidential at that time (and remain confidential stil today).

    The slide on page 46 is very interesting as it outlines plans by LNC to combine both the Velocys GTL plant with the AFC unit to produce both power and diesel/jet fuel from UCG. Also mentioned is PowerHouse Energy in which LNC has a 10 % stake.

    Hopefully LNC will reveal all before the 2012 AGM.


    http://www.brrmedia.com/event/frame/89774

  7. #2207

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    While it is only one part of LNCs interest the current movement in AFC Fuel Cells deserves a focus.

    Latest news is that the Russian Billionaire Roman Abramovich has bought a 15% stake in the company as it prepares to begin a range of commercialization opportunities. This technology fits neatly into LNCs UCG plans and we should expect that at least one of the developments will be with LNC if only to demonstrate the capacities of the system.

    In particular it would be an excellent candidate for the clean energy fund established by the current government.

    AFC shares have jumped sharply and they now have sufficient cash to see them through the first commercial installations.

    The AFC fuel cell techology could well be Microsoft in a garage. It is very cheap and within a couple of years will be directly cost competitive with traditional coal fired power stations - without the pollution.

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/07f0d1be-1...#axzz292Wum1iG

  8. #2208

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    It's very interesting to see what is happening with AFC energy at the moment.

    Only 2 weeks ago the Russian Billionaire Roman Abramovich bought a 15% stake in AFC at 26p a share. The current SP is now over 50p and still climbing. The current AFC shareprice is now higher than LNC's which, when it bought its interest a couple of years ago was seen as the big international company becoming involved in a small technology start up company.

    From all indications there should be an imminent announcement from AFC about the first commercial sales of its fuel cells. They have been successfully operating for over 6 months now at AkzoNobel. In that time the technology has been upgraded and small problems have been addressed. The initial production plant has been opened. One would fervently hope that a similar trial was running at LNC's operation in Chinchilla.

    At some stage I believe the success of AFC's fuel cell and the opportunity for LNC to commercialize it has to come to the attention of analysts.

  9. #2209

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Quote Originally Posted by basilio View Post
    It's very interesting to see what is happening with AFC energy at the moment.

    Only 2 weeks ago the Russian Billionaire Roman Abramovich bought a 15% stake in AFC at 26p a share. The current SP is now over 50p and still climbing. The current AFC shareprice is now higher than LNC's which, when it bought its interest a couple of years ago was seen as the big international company becoming involved in a small technology start up company.

    From all indications there should be an imminent announcement from AFC about the first commercial sales of its fuel cells. They have been successfully operating for over 6 months now at AkzoNobel. In that time the technology has been upgraded and small problems have been addressed. The initial production plant has been opened. One would fervently hope that a similar trial was running at LNC's operation in Chinchilla.

    At some stage I believe the success of AFC's fuel cell and the opportunity for LNC to commercialize it has to come to the attention of analysts.
    I wonder when AFC will make an offer for either Linc energy, or Chelsea football club
    On a serious note, Linc seems to be going nowhere fast.
    I'm wondering if the SP will head south from here as coal prices decrease.
    If the SP hits 50c, I will consider getting back in.
    Good luck with AFC and Linc Basilo.
    Last edited by dogeatdog; 17th-October-2012 at 09:59 AM. Reason: spelling error

  10. #2210

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy Commitment

    Someone needs to ask Pete what he has done with EHS issues in Chinchilla and US Oil and Gas? I would be more worried about major environmental issues and Regulators than BP if I were owning the US properties. That is a train wreck and the management team there is inadequate especially when it comes to personnel and compliance. By the way, what ever happened to their CFO and their GM of EHS in Brisbane? Poof, they are gone. Maybe they knew too much.

  11. #2211

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy Commitment

    Quote Originally Posted by Rainbow54 View Post
    Someone needs to ask Pete what he has done with EHS issues in Chinchilla and US Oil and Gas? I would be more worried about major environmental issues and Regulators than BP if I were owning the US properties. That is a train wreck and the management team there is inadequate especially when it comes to personnel and compliance. By the way, what ever happened to their CFO and their GM of EHS in Brisbane? Poof, they are gone. Maybe they knew too much.
    Hello rainbow. You sound as if you have some grievances???? Care to share, or am I reading too much into your post?

    (Currently not a LNC share holder)

  12. #2212
    awg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Newcastle, NSW
    Posts
    1,657

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    One thing I can say for sure...that is I have found it unprofitable to maintain investments in companies where the management fails to meet announced expectations.

    If this happens TWICE I usually sell.

    So you can only imagine how long ago I sold LNC.

  13. #2213

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy Commitment

    Quote Originally Posted by dogeatdog View Post
    Hello rainbow. You sound as if you have some grievances???? Care to share, or am I reading too much into your post?

    (Currently not a LNC share holder)
    I think there is a lot of unclear issues regarding the acquisition on the gulf coast. Many employees have grievances and legitimate EHS concerns that are being ignored. Look into TNRCC and OSHA complaints dating back to ERG. linc assumed those issues.m The company is under the watchful eye of several regulators related to permitting issues as well as ancient equipment that is not receiving attention. As for bpd, don't be fooled. They have contractors that are costing them far more than they are bringing out of the ground. As for Alaska, I don't get it at all. How is funding this office profitable. Moat is a great unknown or others would have been all over it.

    I also question this Wyoming UCG project which has been proposed for years now with continual excuses related to permit approvals. Perhaps the Sierra club has had an impact or the wrong guy is running the show up there. Regardless Wyoming politics are not the same as Queensland. They have zero qualified staff to manage HR, EHS, Finance, and Land services in the US. Laid off most of the Denver office and are leasing the lavish leases they signed in the heart of Denver. I also heard they made a huge lease commitment in Houston and Baton Rouge which has since been closed. I am a US investor who was sold a bill of goods and cannot let go of my painful losses. Diesel dash is a joke. UCG in the US is a farce with this crew. I hear they have only lawyers on board in Denver and the Houston office is being led by a couple of cronies with no ability to manage a team.

    I am afraid Pete's ego is over the top. Only the best offices worldwide but no money coming in to support. This results in places like Casper losing great people. Schofield failed in the US so they shipped him to SAPEX? China is another drawn out joke. I just wish he would take his ego and money and move on. Who is Ken Dark and what qualifies him to be a leader? Where is a US President? Rohner left as CFO very quietly and Chinchilla continues this commercial pipe dream. Get out now if you are in.

  14. #2214

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy Commitment

    Quote Originally Posted by Rainbow54 View Post
    I think there is a lot of unclear issues regarding the acquisition on the gulf coast. Many employees have grievances and legitimate EHS concerns that are being ignored. Look into TNRCC and OSHA complaints dating back to ERG. linc assumed those issues.m The company is under the watchful eye of several regulators related to permitting issues as well as ancient equipment that is not receiving attention. As for bpd, don't be fooled. They have contractors that are costing them far more than they are bringing out of the ground. As for Alaska, I don't get it at all. How is funding this office profitable. Moat is a great unknown or others would have been all over it.

    I also question this Wyoming UCG project which has been proposed for years now with continual excuses related to permit approvals. Perhaps the Sierra club has had an impact or the wrong guy is running the show up there. Regardless Wyoming politics are not the same as Queensland. They have zero qualified staff to manage HR, EHS, Finance, and Land services in the US. Laid off most of the Denver office and are leasing the lavish leases they signed in the heart of Denver. I also heard they made a huge lease commitment in Houston and Baton Rouge which has since been closed. I am a US investor who was sold a bill of goods and cannot let go of my painful losses. Diesel dash is a joke. UCG in the US is a farce with this crew. I hear they have only lawyers on board in Denver and the Houston office is being led by a couple of cronies with no ability to manage a team.

    I am afraid Pete's ego is over the top. Only the best offices worldwide but no money coming in to support. This results in places like Casper losing great people. Schofield failed in the US so they shipped him to SAPEX? China is another drawn out joke. I just wish he would take his ego and money and move on. Who is Ken Dark and what qualifies him to be a leader? Where is a US President? Rohner left as CFO very quietly and Chinchilla continues this commercial pipe dream. Get out now if you are in.
    Hello Rainbow, and thank you for your comments.

    I've made a tidy profit from owning Linc shares in the past, including a sizable dividend payout following the Adani deal, so I'm grateful of what PB/Linc have achieved historically.
    Of course, the past is the past, and I've concluded that PB is "almost" a master of spin.

    I currently have no vested interest, but still believe the company has potential.
    The investment in UK based AFC appears to be a wise one, and should benefit Linc's desire to produce "clean" energy once both AFC's fuel cell, and LNC's technologies have been perfected.

    Linc's foray into O & G leaves me mystified to be honest.

    Rainbow... your obviously disgruntled, but are you able to display links or factual evidence regarding your allegations mentioned above? I am genuinely interested in what you have highlighted.

  15. #2215

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Looks like the stock is really tanking. Any news from LNC on what's going on or is this still fallout / market reaction to the USD265 million Bond Issue? The AGM this year is going to be interesting.

  16. #2216

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Quote Originally Posted by johnpw View Post
    Looks like the stock is really tanking. Any news from LNC on what's going on or is this still fallout / market reaction to the USD265 million Bond Issue? The AGM this year is going to be interesting.
    I'm in no doubt MR Bond, not James Bond, will come up with some wonderful spin.
    I'll will be tempted however, to buy in around 50c and hold.

  17. #2217

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    That September report is disappointing. It's seems clear that the intentions to get to 6000 BPD oil production by the end of the year are fanciful. There is just too much ground to be made up in the next couple of months for that to happen.

    A significant shortfall there means LNC will not be making enough coin from their oil production to break even by June 2013. More negative financing.

    Six months after the initial announcement there is still no certainty about the GCL deal. Again with no money coming in finances will be tight.

    Clearly there are lots of projects that "might" be sold, "could" be developed. But these stories have been running for four years now and we have only see one major tick - the Adani coal sale.

    Its not good enough.

  18. #2218

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Quote Originally Posted by basilio View Post
    That September report is disappointing. It's seems clear that the intentions to get to 6000 BPD oil production by the end of the year are fanciful. There is just too much ground to be made up in the next couple of months for that to happen.

    A significant shortfall there means LNC will not be making enough coin from their oil production to break even by June 2013. More negative financing.

    Six months after the initial announcement there is still no certainty about the GCL deal. Again with no money coming in finances will be tight.

    Clearly there are lots of projects that "might" be sold, "could" be developed. But these stories have been running for four years now and we have only see one major tick - the Adani coal sale.

    Its not good enough.
    Well said Basilio.
    Having just browsed the latest Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report, it paints a picture of optimism, typical of PB.
    It points to a great deal of information regarding projects, happening by the end of 2012, in addition to other projects being way out there in the future.
    With the cash flow burn at current levels, I fear the SP will continue to head south.
    This company has to be a speculative buy, but not for the faint hearted.

    (Currently not a share holder)

  19. #2219

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    So far as I'm concerned this company is too focused on newsletters, promotional stunts and so on and not sufficiently focused on actually producing a product they can sell (that is, bringing some money in).

    Remember the "Diesel Dash"? It made a nice point yes, but what was the commercial point of it really? Why promote that your fuel works, when you don't actually have any fuel available to sell? The only point I can see is to draw attention to the company itself and thus encourage investors to buy shares. It's not as though anyone who saw the vehicle has the opportunity to purchase the product themselves.

    Wouldn't it make more sense that at this scale of operation they just sell any diesel etc they make to someone like BP, Caltex, Shell or whoever as a bulk product and not worry about the marketing? I know that the major oil companies have certainly agreed to take the production of minor fuel producers in the past and blend it with their own stock. So far as technical requirements are concerned, obviously they'd insist on proper lab testing but they do that with the output of their own refineries anyway so it's no big deal.

    Same with the raw syngas from UCG. If it were me, I'd start by just selling the stuff "as is" as fuel to power stations or a large factory etc for which it is quite suitable. That would get cash coming in. Worry about the liquids production and/or building their own power stations later. For the moment, just be the upstream supplier of an alternative fuel and sell it "as is" to whoever you can find to buy it.

    I can assure you that management of thermal power stations (those that run on coal, gas or oil and which account for 90% or so of all power generated in Australia) are always willing to talk to anyone who suggests the possibility of cheaper fuel since fuel is by far their largest operating expense.

    I like the technology this company has that is for sure. But as much as I like the idea, I just don't trust that management is sufficiently focused on running the business as such.

  20. #2220

    Default Re: LNC - Linc Energy

    Ok . It's midnight on Cup Day and my nags are still trying to find the finish line....

    So why not spin another Linc Energy Story....

    It seems that the Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich has jetted into Brisbane and Perth last week on a mystery business trip.

    I reckon... that he intends to jump into Linc Energy and take a piece of the action with Peter Bond. He has had a long look at the UCG technology that LNC now owns (remembering that the first plant is in Russia) and can see how he can turn Russian coal into syn gas, clean electricity and clean diesel fuel.

    Remember that he has just bought 15% of AFC in UK which is the pivotal piece of technology between UCG and clean low cost, no CO2 electricty.

    And Peter Bond and Linc badly need to pull a very big bunny out of the hat.

    And we all lived happily ever after.

    __________________________________________________ ________________________________

    By the way LNC has "jumped" 10% from Friday morning....

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/ab...106-28w15.html
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...FC-Energy.html

Similar Threads

  1. New energy revolution? Frozen natural gas
    By metric in forum General Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13th-March-2013, 02:44 PM
  2. Energy
    By Happy in forum General Chat
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 25th-July-2010, 10:08 AM
  3. KEN - KUTh Energy
    By purple in forum Stocks I-P
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16th-October-2009, 08:38 PM
  4. Geothermal Energy anyone?
    By sam76 in forum Commodities
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 6th-October-2006, 10:33 PM
  5. Energy stocks
    By Aden_1 in forum ASX Stock Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 8th-September-2005, 11:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Aussie Stock Forums