I'm trying to understand net debt/equity ratios. What does it mean when the debt/equity ratio is a negative figure like -15% 0r -118% ?
Thanks
I'm trying to understand net debt/equity ratios. What does it mean when the debt/equity ratio is a negative figure like -15% 0r -118% ?
Thanks
A negative debt/equity ratio would indicate negative equity.
e.g. a loan of 75K over an asset worth 100K means equity of 25K and debt/equity ratio of 3. If the value of the asset halves then equity becomes -25K (50-75) and debt/equity ratio becomes -3.
As I understand it in regards to stocks, the lower the percentage, the less debt there is against the companys equity.
So the above would not be -300% but 150% - meaning that for the amount of equity in the company (50k) there is a debt charge of 1.5 times. i.e. 75/50= 150%
As far as I know there is no such thing in stocks as negative D/E - please correct me if Im wrong. Though that this was more an accounting concept??
Hmmm just learnt something.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/...#axzz1iH1HqoyV
A company could have negative equity but would of course be insolvent.
If a company's total assets were worth 50K and it had external liabilities of 75K then shareholders' funds (or equity) would be minus 25K - and debt/equity ratio would be -3 or -300%.
Found the below definition from the ASX site.
Also, Shareholder Equity is equal to the amount of money that has been raised by issuance of shares.
Still not sure how you get a negative D/E ratio?? Fully accept that you can have negative equity as per investopedia but not sure on how you get -ve total debt or -ve shareholder equity to make the below ratio negative?? Any smartees out there that can please explain a -ve D/E ratio to MR D.Shmuck
debt equity ratio
Relationship between funds provided by borrowing and funds provided by shareholders. The debt/equity ratio shows to what extent a company is financed by debt (also called the gearing or leverage ratio).
Debt/Equity ratio = (total debt / shareholder equity) x 100
Yes, you're right elbee. My original question referred to net debt/equity ratios, but then I kept referring to debt/equity ratios, because I didn't know the difference, and so just confused the issue.
I have since found that a company with a negative net debt equity ratio is very healthy, because it has little debt, unlike a company with a negative debt/equity ratio.
This is a definition I came across:
Net debt-to-equity ratio
(This calculation produces one of the most powerful ratios available when an investor wishes to avoid doomed stock)
It is calculated by taking total short-term and long-term debt financing employed, subtracting available cash and measuring this against the shareholders equity supporting that debt. Anything above a conservative level of gearing can put significant amounts of pressure on the business cash flow. Pressure which will likely be more pronounced for highly geared businesses or businesses in stress. As a guide, look carefully at businesses with Net Debt-to-Equity Ratios exceeding 50%.
Not always.
Say a house's market value is $400k but has debt of $500k against it, it will be in negative equity.
However, the debt has interest rate of 3% yet rental yield is 5%, the property is still cashflow positive.
Provided that the debt isn't fall due or that convenent isn't breached (like LVR), it can remain a solvent situation.
Austar is an example where the balance sheet is showing negative net equity... I am not sure how that came about but as far as I know it is relatively solvent.
Simple DEBT/EQUITY RATIO less than 100 is comfortable but higher indicates a highly geared company, aim for <80 or for the more conservative <50
Personally in analysis i scrap any company who does not meet this level.
Bookmarks