For reasons concerned with site design, I am taking a survey of Aussie Stock Forums members screen resolutions.
If you are not sure what yours is, please do the following:
1. Right click on the desktop
2. Select properties
3. Select settings
Your screen resolution is in the area designated 'Screen Area'.
Thank you for your assistance.
:)
stefan
8th-November-2004, 09:58 PM
Joe, I'm pretty sure you should change the last option from 1280 x 720 to 1280 x 1024 because this what a 4:3 screen would normally look like. 1280x720 is 16:9 and only very few screens are in this format.
Mine is 1280x1024 which I regard as a minimum for a trading screen.
Cheers
Stefan
still_in_school
8th-November-2004, 10:06 PM
Hi Joe,
mine is the same as Stefan, screen resolution (1280x1024) though im guessing Stefan is also using a 19" monitor.
Cheers,
sis
stefan
8th-November-2004, 10:17 PM
though im guessing Stefan is also using a 19" monitor.SIS, correct.
Happy trading
Stefan
Joe Blow
8th-November-2004, 10:24 PM
Joe, I'm pretty sure you should change the last option from 1280 x 720 to 1280 x 1024 because this what a 4:3 screen would normally look like. 1280x720 is 16:9 and only very few screens are in this format.
Mine is 1280x1024 which I regard as a minimum for a trading screen.
Cheers
Stefan
Poll edited.
Thanks!
:)
GreatPig
8th-November-2004, 11:32 PM
I mostly use 1600 x 1200 on a notebook (15" LCD screen) but occasionally access from a desktop using 1024 x 768.
And yes, people do often comment on how small the writing is :D.
Cheers,
GP
wayneL
9th-November-2004, 03:01 AM
1024 x 768 ....3 X screens
kifoghorn
9th-November-2004, 06:30 PM
I only have a 17" inch monitor, but since going to 1280 x 1024, I won't got back :D
Would love a 19" + screen, preferrable an lcd. :p:
Porper
9th-November-2004, 07:32 PM
I'm the same as you Kifoghorn, infact I have just changed from a CRT to an LCD, can't say I am that impressed either, maybe rather than buying a cheapish one I should have waited for MUL to have their surge and buy a nice one with the profits :rolleyes:
Redwing
9th-November-2004, 11:48 PM
1280x800 LCD screen..i'llhave to look at what the difference makes.
REDWING
kifoghorn
10th-November-2004, 08:04 AM
I'm the same as you Kifoghorn, infact I have just changed from a CRT to an LCD, can't say I am that impressed either, maybe rather than buying a cheapish one I should have waited for MUL to have their surge and buy a nice one with the profits :rolleyes:
One remark regarding the default window size of this forum.
Why do you set it?
I find it rather annoying when my browser window changes its size once I come here. The forum itself has no need for a 1024x768 size and works just as well in a smaller window. So all it does is creating a mess on my screen by overlapping everything else that's on there. If you happen to have a trading software, you're always keen to keep everything sorted and at its place. The last thing you want is a window that pops up way too big.
Just thought I'd let you know. I'll still come here even if you don't do anything about it ;)
Happy trading
Stefan
Joe Blow
10th-November-2004, 12:54 PM
Joe,
One remark regarding the default window size of this forum.
Why do you set it?
I find it rather annoying when my browser window changes its size once I come here. The forum itself has no need for a 1024x768 size and works just as well in a smaller window. So all it does is creating a mess on my screen by overlapping everything else that's on there. If you happen to have a trading software, you're always keen to keep everything sorted and at its place. The last thing you want is a window that pops up way too big.
Just thought I'd let you know. I'll still come here even if you don't do anything about it ;)
Happy trading
Stefan
Stefan,
I have modified the code. Let me know if it is fixed!
I have just bought the CMV CT-726d which I presume is the model after the one in your quote as it has a 14ms response time.
I can't say I am that impressed, it's ok after fiddling with the settings, and I only have an onboard graphics card so I have to use the VGA connection, not the DVI so maybe that is why the detail and colour aren't as good as my old CRT.Good specs though,and a really good price ($466.00) this is New Zealand dollars though !!So really all I can say is it's ok. :confused:
kifoghorn
10th-November-2004, 08:49 PM
Kifoghorn
I have just bought the CMV CT-726d which I presume is the model after the one in your quote as it has a 14ms response time.
I can't say I am that impressed, it's ok after fiddling with the settings, and I only have an onboard graphics card so I have to use the VGA connection, not the DVI so maybe that is why the detail and colour aren't as good as my old CRT.Good specs though,and a really good price ($466.00) this is New Zealand dollars though !!So really all I can say is it's ok. :confused:
Mmmm, me thinks its time to reseach LCDs again :D Prices look much better. ;)
kifoghorn
12th-November-2004, 11:29 AM
Kifoghorn
I only have an onboard graphics card so I have to use the VGA connection, not the DVI so maybe that is why the detail and colour aren't as good as my old CRT.
Yea that would explain it. I read that DVI help a bit.
roofus
12th-November-2004, 11:39 AM
anyone that is serious about trading should go out and get a second monitor along with a second VGA PCI card. And while your at it, start up an account with AOT Online. AOT is far superior in its setup and service than any banks platform(commsec,e-trade,westpac,etc)
SuperTed
12th-November-2004, 10:16 PM
I use 1200x1024 on a 21" (the same when i had a 19") crt monitor. This alllowed me to fit in the whole trading screen without having to scroll. Scrolling was on a 17" @ 800x600
ghotib
16th-November-2004, 10:12 AM
Joe,
Just FYI, my problem with the browser window size is also fixed now. It used to expand off the right side of the screen. Not a killer, but I've glad to be without it.
Cheers,
Ghoti
still_in_school
16th-November-2004, 11:47 AM
anyone that is serious about trading should go out and get a second monitor along with a second VGA PCI card. And while your at it, start up an account with AOT Online. AOT is far superior in its setup and service than any banks platform(commsec,e-trade,westpac,etc)
also, i do believe too, if your serious about trading, theres not too much essentials you need...
but just a reliable computer,
dedicated internet (if your day trading)
dedicated online platform if your trading online
reliable, but contactable broker (if calling)
Mobile Phone (a must)
Charting Software programs (optional)
Trading Plan
Caculator
... these are just simple things... but things i would call a must...
Cheers,
sis
stockGURU
20th-November-2004, 10:02 PM
1024 x 768 screen resolution on a 17 inch monitor.
I find 1152 x 862 is a little hard to read sometimes so I stick with what I know.
Wish I had a 19 inch monitor! :(
crashy
21st-November-2004, 03:21 PM
currently run 2 x lcd screens (you cant use CRT unless you plan to be blind within 5 years) one 18" @ 1280 x 1024 and one 12" @ 480 x 600 for chatroom.
Use to run 4 x LCD 15" but it screwed my neck up, so went back to 2.
Joe Blow
19th-January-2005, 06:33 PM
I'm just bumping this thread so people who have joined up over the last few months can participate in this survey.
If you haven't already voted, I'd really appreciate your input!
Thanks!
:)
rozella
20th-January-2005, 12:33 PM
I use 1600 x 600 with dual monitors......suits AOT's 8 horizontal frames nicely, & 800 x 600 with the other single monotors. All 17"
rozella
money tree
20th-January-2005, 03:29 PM
Mission control here, running 4 x 18" @ 1280 x 1024.
Also I have a video sender transmitting image from one monitor to every tv in the house, so when Im watching TV in the lounge I can use P.I.P or split screen to see quote screen and tv all at once.
I see they have wireless monitors now, you can take it all round the house, hell I would hang it around my neck LOL!
Joe Blow
2nd-August-2006, 12:01 AM
Thought I would resurrect this old poll to give those who haven't seen it a chance to vote.
If you haven't already voted, please let me know your screen resolution by selecting one of the options above. :)
nelly
2nd-August-2006, 07:16 PM
1280x960....LCD....Radeon x300 series
cheerful :D
bvbfan
2nd-August-2006, 10:31 PM
1920 x 1200 on two Dell 24"
But currently using laptop until new Intel processors come out so I can upgrade
Smurf1976
2nd-August-2006, 11:44 PM
currently run 2 x lcd screens (you cant use CRT unless you plan to be blind within 5 years) one 18" @ 1280 x 1024 and one 12" @ 480 x 600 for chatroom.
Use to run 4 x LCD 15" but it screwed my neck up, so went back to 2.
My monitor resolution is 800 x 600. Only read the rest of this post if you want to know how to set up your lighting so you don't get eye strain etc...
I'm doubtful that CRT will send you blind, or even do any real damage to your eyes for that matter if used properly.
Lighting and proper setting of the monitor's contols are the key to this. I work in an environment where we have a whole wall full of CRT monitors...
As for the lighting, for general office work you want about 400 lux. Modern computer monitors will be fine used with such lighting as long as it is set up so as not to cause glare. If you're only doing screen based work then you can drop that to 200 - 300 lux.
The proper way to set up the lighting is with a light meter. But assuming you don't have one of those, if you have about 570 lumens of light per square metre of floor area then it will be reasonably close to 400 lux if the walls and ceiling are a reasonably light colour. Scale that if you want a different light level. Obviously you'll need a lot more light if you paint the room black...
A 60 watt bulb produces around 600 - 700 lumens so you'll need a lot of bulbs to light even a small work environment to proper standards. This will keep you busy changing bulbs and hand over your trading profits to your power supplier. Also it will produce an incredible amount of heat.
Halogen bulbs aren't much better. They are only slightly more efficient than ordinary bulbs (contrary to popular belief) although much of the heat is directed into the roof space if they're mounted in the ceiling (NEVER cover them with insulation!). That said, nothing wrong with them or ordinary globes if you have enough of them.
So realistically I suggest that you ought to have some sort of fluorescent light. If you want no flickering when you turn the light on or if a tube fails then use electronic starters (about $12 each (need one per tube) from Jaycar. Any electrical wholesaler can obtain them too (but may not have them in stock). Many brands are coloured green and installation is a simple DIY job - just take out the old starter and replace it with the new one. They are generally NOT suitable for fittings having 2 x 18 watt tubes however (but OK for single 18 watt tubes and double tube fittings in larger sizes).
Or you could just get a nice new T5 fluorescent fitting which has zero visbile flicker (because it runs at very high frequency) and no starters. A very "green" option too since the small tubes produce little waste, last 20,000 hours and the whole thing doesn't use much power/
I suggest that you have the lights at 90 degrees to the screen, NOT parallel with it to minimise glare. For suspended ceiling systems in commercial buildings, there are "paracube" diffusers that can be retrofitted to completely eliminate glare from lights (they look black when viewed from the side so NO reflections in the monitor). You can get surface mounted similar fittings for use at home if you want.
An 18 watt (60 cm long) tube produces about 1350 lumens. About 3300 for a 36 watt (120 cm long) tube and about 5100 for a 58 watt tube (150 cm long).
For circular tubes, 22 watt is similar output to 18 watt straight tube, 40 watt is similar to straight 36 watt etc. For T5 tubes, 14 watt is similar to 18 watt ordinary (T8) tube, 28 watt is similar to ordinary 36 watt etc. You can also get 21 and 35 watt T5 tubes and 32 watt circular tubes.
So, in a small 3 x 3 metre bedroom being used as a home office, I suggest that a single 58 watt flourescent light with a diffuser is a good option. If you're only doing computer (not paper) work then a single 36 watt tube would be fine. In a 5 x 5 metre room, two 2 x 36 watt fittings (4 tubes in total) would give around 400 lux.
Normally in an office environment you would use white tubes (colour code 840) but it's no problem to have "yellow" light which matches that of ordinary bulbs (or halogen) - just use "warm white" (830) tubes. If you want to match natural daylight then use "daylight" (860) tubes. Bunnings keep most of these. Failing that, a lighting shop should be able to get them, as can any electrical wholesaler. There's a BIG difference in the light quality of these modern fluorescents compared to the old ones that might annoy you at work (those tubes are no longer available in Australia (effectively banned) so you won't have to put up with them much longer).
As for me, I have my monitor set to 800 x 600 and the light level is around 400 lux. No need to use unnecessarily small print (ergonomics etc) and I have no need for higher resolution. At work we also run 800 x 600 (again for ergonomic reasons) - light level in the office about 400 lux and about 200 - 300 lux in the room full of monitors (mix of fluorescent (830) at 200 lux for background lighting and halogen at 300 lux on the desks). NONE of the people who work in this environment wear glasses so presumably we've got it reasonably OK in that regard. We've certainly put some effort into it...
Regarding LCD monitors, I've yet to see any LCD monitor that matches the visual performance of a CRT. The newer ones are getting better though as long as you are sitting pretty much in front of the screen. Same with TV - you'll get a better image from a CRT than an LCD or plasma.
That said, I'm not aware of any reason to not use LCD or plasma as long a you're happy with the image. But you shouldn't be watching TV in the dark (but you don't need 400 lux in the lounge room either, about 40 lux is normally considered reasonable for most unless you're reading).
Now, after all that I had better vote in the poll... :D
noirua
3rd-August-2006, 08:53 AM
I remember seeing a programme about a hunter who had not used any modern form of lighting and his eyesight was amazingly good at the age of 83.
So it is probably best to have your computer outside using normal light, or to work in a greenhouse. Adding some solar panels would help with the green potential and the plants all around would have a soothing affect.
