Contrary to what some seminar clowns teach, they are a lousy strategy to intitiate for the sake of it. There are strategies that are 1,000,000% better.
They do, however, have their use...under the following conditions they make good sense.
1/ You already own the stock.
2/ Your short term view is that the share price will go sideways or down
3/ You don't want to sell the stock, even if it does go down (short term)
4/ Premiums are high enough to warrant the risk of your shares being called in a sudden up move. (bearing in mind you don't want to sell)...or having to defend against you being called.
money tree
9th-June-2005, 12:14 AM
I went to a Peter Spann seminar other day, he was quoting 50-80% and reckons ASX is the one bragging about it.......we shook our heads in disbelief
wayneL
9th-June-2005, 12:42 AM
I went to a Peter Spann seminar other day, he was quoting 50-80% and reckons ASX is the one bragging about it.......we shook our heads in disbelief
It's got me buggered how they get away with it. I 'spose the ASX benefits from all the churn.
money tree
9th-June-2005, 08:42 AM
wanna know the real funny part?
as his example, he used BHP
gee. you would have only been exercised about 12/12 times and given away about $8 cap gains.....
not to mention your cashflow would have dried up after 1 or 2 months.....meaning you would be forced to sell the stock
wayneL
9th-June-2005, 11:18 PM
I wonder why he didn't use Elan as his example!:grenade: